Re: [PATCH] Unbreak interactive GPG prompt upon signing
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Sep 6, 2016, 16:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609061834490.129229@virtualbox>
- In-Reply-To
- <ced7502d-0095-bd90-19e3-c14d0e4d4f07@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin venit, vidit, dixit 06.09.2016 10:01: > > With the recent update in efee955 (gpg-interface: check gpg signature > > creation status, 2016-06-17), we ask GPG to send all status updates to > > stderr, and then catch the stderr in an strbuf. > > > > But GPG might fail, and send error messages to stderr. And we simply > > do not show them to the user. > > > > Even worse: this swallows any interactive prompt for a passphrase. And > > detaches stderr from the tty so that the passphrase cannot be read. > > > > So while the first problem could be fixed (by printing the captured > > stderr upon error), the second problem cannot be easily fixed, and > > presents a major regression. > > My Git has that commit and does ask me for the passphrase on the tty. > Also, I do get error messages: > > git tag -u pebcak -s testt -m m > error: gpg failed to sign the data > error: unable to sign the tag
That is not GPG's error message. It just leaves users puzzled, is what it does.
> which we could (maybe should) amend by gpg's stderr.
Right. But then we still do not solve the problem. The problem being that some platforms cannot use getpass(prompt): it simply does not exist.
On Windows, we do not even have a /dev/tty (technically, GPG, being an MSYS2 program, knows about /dev/tty, but we spawn it from a non-MSYS2 program, so there is a disconnect).
> > So let's just revert commit efee9553a4f97b2ecd8f49be19606dd4cf7d9c28. > > That "just" reintroduces the problem that the orignal patch solves.
Right. Which is: when some user misconfigures gpg, causing Git to run something different that simply succeeds, there is no signature.
This is a minor issue, as it requires a user to configure gpg, and do a bad job at it.
Not being able to input the passphrase on Windows is a major issue, as the user has done nothing wrong.
> The passphrase/tty issue must be Windows specific - or the non-issue > Linux-specific, if you prefer.
Sure. Let's talk about semantics. Oh wait, maybe we should work on resolving the issue instead.
> > This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/871
To reiterate: this is the problem I need to see solved.
Ciao, Dscho