Re: [Administrivia] On ruby and contrib/

From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Jun 9, 2013, 02:57 UTC
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.1306090456160.28957@s15462909.onlinehome-server.info>
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0m4V4KYyKW8KJMRsCgOxqcLi0XDYZvS4w++6BKVVvioyw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ram,

On Sat, 8 Jun 2013, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:

Show 8 quoted lines

> Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >> Also we heard from no regular/high-value reviewers that they feel
> >> comfortable reviewing additions in Ruby.
> >
> > Correction; *current* regular/high-value reviewers.
> 
> Correct.  The opinions of inactive community members and
> non-contributors are less useful.

I humbly suggest to treat other people's contribution with the same respect you want yours' to be treated.

Just a suggestion, J

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.