Re: [Administrivia] On ruby and contrib/
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 8, 2013, 10:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s1JdakrtcaXbO0rxob7+NPCo-Bp4uGO6-6-o3ACriOwhg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8BngfgTfXDXvzjmu0t__86LAivP+_VhGUSXmG5hTnM9SA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Felipe Contreras > <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The reviewer pool for code written in a new language _must_ be >>> seeded by some from the current set of reviewers whose judgement >>> I/we can trust. >> >> By that standard nothing will ever change. Ever. >> >> Even twenty years from now, you will still only trust people that are >> familiar with shell, Perl, and C. Because the only way to gain your >> trust, is by being proficient in shell, Perl, and C. > > I don't see why a trusted person cannot learn a new language and > convince the community to give it a try (well given that enough > reviewers support the new language, which was Junio's point).
I do. Raise your hand if you are interested in giving a try to Ruby for Git's core given that somebody gives convincing reasons?
How many hands do you expect?
-- Felipe Contreras