Re: [PATCH] Respect crlf attribute even if core.autocrlf has not been set
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jul 23, 2008, 19:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807232040320.8986@racer>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vd4l4cs24.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> writes: > > >> There are certain file formats, such as a Visual Studio .sln file, > >> that MUST be CRLF. When a .sln file is not CRLF, Visual Studio > >> refuses to read it. I want to be able to set into the committed > >> .gitattributes file the list of files that must be translated to the > >> proper format regardless of the autocrlf setting. An example is > >> below: > >> > >> *.bat crlf > >... > >> *.vcw crlf > > > > Wouldn't "*bat -crlf " etc be good for these, and thus store CRLF in > > the repo. > > I'd agree. And I do not think we would want to introduce "crlf=force" > that converts working tree files that could be LF terminated to CRLF > upon checking in. That is as bad as some helpful editors that adds CR > at the end of line without being asked.
You can say that only because you are not in the situation having a lot of CR/LF files in your _public_ repository _in spite of_ setting the gitattributes correctly.
That seriously sucks.
Ciao, Dscho