Re: [PATCH v16 Part II 6/8] bisect--helper: `get_terms` & `bisect_terms` shell function in C
- From
Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
- Date
- Nov 8, 2017, 00:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <aacc7970-6952-206e-5ef0-10e0cf3d7373@ramsayjones.plus.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <0102015f5e5ee303-449f1b76-ff53-433c-8973-8b4850466810-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com>
On 27/10/17 16:06, Pranit Bauva wrote:
Show 77 quoted lines
> Reimplement the `get_terms` and `bisect_terms` shell function in C and
> add `bisect-terms` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it from
> git-bisect.sh .
>
> Using `--bisect-terms` subcommand is a temporary measure to port shell
> function in C so as to use the existing test suite. As more functions
> are ported, this subcommand will be retired but its implementation will
> be called by some other methods.
>
> Also use error() to report "no terms defined" and accordingly change the
> test in t6030.
>
> Mentored-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
> Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
> ---
> builtin/bisect--helper.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> git-bisect.sh | 35 ++---------------------
> t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/bisect--helper.c b/builtin/bisect--helper.c
> index 0f9c3e63821b8..ab0580ce0089a 100644
> --- a/builtin/bisect--helper.c
> +++ b/builtin/bisect--helper.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ static const char * const git_bisect_helper_usage[] = {
> N_("git bisect--helper --bisect-write <state> <revision> <good_term> <bad_term> [<nolog>]"),
> N_("git bisect--helper --bisect-check-and-set-terms <command> <good_term> <bad_term>"),
> N_("git bisect--helper --bisect-next-check [<term>] <good_term> <bad_term>"),
> + N_("git bisect--helper --bisect-terms [--term-good | --term-old | --term-bad | --term-new]"),
> NULL
> };
>
> @@ -344,6 +345,62 @@ static int bisect_next_check(const struct bisect_terms *terms,
> return retval;
> }
>
> +static int get_terms(struct bisect_terms *terms)
> +{
> + struct strbuf str = STRBUF_INIT;
> + FILE *fp = NULL;
> + int res = 0;
> +
> + fp = fopen(git_path_bisect_terms(), "r");
> + if (!fp)
> + goto fail;
> +
> + free_terms(terms);
> + strbuf_getline_lf(&str, fp);
> + terms->term_bad = strbuf_detach(&str, NULL);
> + strbuf_getline_lf(&str, fp);
> + terms->term_good = strbuf_detach(&str, NULL);
> + goto finish;
> +
> +fail:
> + res = -1;
> +finish:
> + if (fp)
> + fclose(fp);
> + strbuf_release(&str);
> + return res;
> +}
> +
> +static int bisect_terms(struct bisect_terms *terms, const char **argv, int argc)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + if (get_terms(terms))
> + return error(_("no terms defined"));
> +
> + if (argc > 1)
> + return error(_("--bisect-term requires exactly one argument"));
> +
> + if (argc == 0)
> + return !printf(_("Your current terms are %s for the old state\n"
> + "and %s for the new state.\n"),
> + terms->term_good, terms->term_bad);Again, I don't think you want to do this. :-D
Show 6 quoted lines
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < argc; i++) {
> + if (!strcmp(argv[i], "--term-good"))> + printf(_("%s\n"), terms->term_good);
> + else if (!strcmp(argv[i], "--term-bad"))
> + printf(_("%s\n"), terms->term_bad);
> + elseHere, you want to check for the pairs "--term-{good,old}" and "--term-{bad,new}", so maybe this instead:
+ if (one_of(argv[i], "--term-good", "--term-old", NULL)) + printf("%s\n", terms->term_good); + else if (one_of(argv[i], "--term-bad", "--term-new", NULL)) + printf("%s\n", terms->term_bad); + else
Show 9 quoted lines
> + error(_("BUG: invalid argument %s for 'git bisect terms'.\n"
> + "Supported options are: "
> + "--term-good|--term-old and "
> + "--term-bad|--term-new."), argv[i]);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +ATB, Ramsay Jones