Re: [PATCH 1/5] Internationalization of git-gui
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jul 21, 2007, 21:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707212234500.14781@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vabtpv43d.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Hi,
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 29 quoted lines
> The division of labor I think would make sense for message l10n > process goes like this: > > - The software developer (primarily Shawn): responsible for > marking messages subject to i18n; > > - The i18n coordinator (could be Shawn but anybody else can > volunteer; as things stand, I think Christian and Johannes > are doing this): responsible for running "make > po/git-gui.pot; make update-po" from time to time in order to > keep po/*.po in sync with the vocabulary. > > initially, populate "glossary" part in po/git-gui.pot; > > as needed, add entries "glossary" part in po/git-gui.pot, and > (if possible) add corresponding placeholders to po/*.po; > > - Translators (one for each language): responsible for updating > po/xx.po file; > > initially, start by copying po/git-gui.pot to create > po/xx.po; > > maintainance of "glossary" part of po/xx.po could also be > made this person's responsibility instead of i18n > coordinator's. > > This way, the translators do not have to be so familiar with the > gettext toolchain nor even have to have gettext installed.
Makes tons of sense to me.
Ciao, Dscho