Re: What's in git.git (stable)
- From
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
- Date
- Dec 14, 2006, 17:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612141221300.18171@xanadu.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <200612141021.12637.andyparkins@gmail.com>
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Andy Parkins wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> > Besides, The fact that revert _adds_ to history is a nice way to > > document that you reverted that change. And you can even explain in the > > commit message, why you did it. > > I'm not disputing that the /operation/ is useful, I'm arguing that it is > incorrectly named.
Well, people are used to say they've "reverted" a change. Although the command might appear slightly misnamed wrt its operation, it still does what most people are expecting from such a name.