Re: What's in git.git (stable)
- From
- Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 14, 2006, 13:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200612141320.26729.andyparkins@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20061214121048.GM1747@spearce.org>
On Thursday 2006 December 14 12:10, Shawn Pearce wrote:
> not predict future results"... The size of objects in the pack > tends to be small up front (commits/trees) and larger in the back > (blobs). The size distribution probably also gets more erratic > near the back as the blob sizes may not follow a nice distribution.
Oh well; that pretty much settles it then.
> But as you state, its easy to refine it over time, and the closer we > get to the end the more likely it is to be correct. Unless its that > 23 MiB blob. As it takes up about 85% of that repository's pack.
I had imagined (foolishly), that most objects would be diffs, and would be similarly sized.
Scratch that.
Andy
-- Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIEE