RE: What's in git.git (stable)
- From
- Raimund Bauer <ray@softwarelandschaft.com>
- Date
- Dec 15, 2006, 09:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <002401c7202f$34f2af20$0b0aa8c0@abf.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <200612150858.25988.andyparkins@gmail.com>
Show 11 quoted lines
> Yep. Although you've persuaded me with the above example, I > think this is the > correct path. It's not wise to add every bell and whistle > just because we > can. As long as there is /a/ way to achieve every task, > that's good enough, > we don't need every way to achieve every task. We might even > argue that > git's flexibility is what makes it harder to learn. It's > similar to UNIX in > that respect - hard to learn, easy to use.
So we prefer to tell users "You can do what you want with these 3 commands, since we don't want to confuse use with another option to do it with just 1"?
> Andy
-- best regards Ray