Re: [PATCH 00/28] clean-ups of static functions and returns
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Aug 14, 2006, 20:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0608142257130.28360@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0608141345530.19669@chino.corp.google.com>
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, David Rientjes wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > Could you please make description of patch series email to be parent > > (ancestor) of all patches emails, i.e. for patches either to be > > chain-replied to introduction email, or all be replies to introduction > > email. > > > > It makes for easier reading/viewing/applying/ignoring the series. > > > > Sure, but you might also want to include this request explicitly in > Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
Well... there are people (like yours truly), who still hack there mails in pine, and who do not use git-send-email (I had too many problems with Perl, and git-send-email _is_ in Perl)... For me, it would be an undue burden.
Ciao, Dscho