Re: [PATCH 00/28] clean-ups of static functions and returns
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 14, 2006, 20:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ebqmlk$npt$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0608141314350.19383@chino.corp.google.com>
David Rientjes wrote:
> This patch series cleans up a number of static function returns that are either > meaningless or could be more efficiently written.
Could you please make description of patch series email to be parent (ancestor) of all patches emails, i.e. for patches either to be chain-replied to introduction email, or all be replies to introduction email.
It makes for easier reading/viewing/applying/ignoring the series.
Thanks in advance
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git