Re: [PATCH 00/28] clean-ups of static functions and returns
- From
- David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
- Date
- Aug 14, 2006, 20:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0608141345530.19669@chino.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <ebqmlk$npt$1@sea.gmane.org>
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Could you please make description of patch series email to be parent > (ancestor) of all patches emails, i.e. for patches either to be > chain-replied to introduction email, or all be replies to introduction > email. > > It makes for easier reading/viewing/applying/ignoring the series. >
Sure, but you might also want to include this request explicitly in Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
David