From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:59:18 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] clean-ups of static functions and returns
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0608142257130.28360@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0608141345530.19669@chino.corp.google.com>

Hi,

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, David Rientjes wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> > Could you please make description of patch series email to be parent
> > (ancestor) of all patches emails, i.e. for patches either to be 
> > chain-replied to introduction email, or all be replies to introduction
> > email.
> > 
> > It makes for easier reading/viewing/applying/ignoring the series.
> > 
> 
> Sure, but you might also want to include this request explicitly in 
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches.

Well... there are people (like yours truly), who still hack there mails in 
pine, and who do not use git-send-email (I had too many problems with 
Perl, and git-send-email _is_ in Perl)... For me, it would be an undue 
burden.

Ciao,
Dscho