Re: [PATCH 3/6] Glean libexec path from argv[0] for git-upload-pack and git-receive-pack.
- From
Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de>
- Date
- Jan 11, 2009, 10:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <E976B246-AD14-4B03-B204-F6A1014071DF@zib.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7viqomx5iq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Jan 10, 2009, at 9:36 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de> writes: > >> On Jan 10, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> >>> Logically, and to avoid committing a broken revision, 1/6 should >>> come >>> last, methinks. >> >> RUNTIME_PREFIX is not defined before 6/6. But I agree, >> 1/6 should probably be moved after 5/6. >> > Hmm, I actually was thinking about applying that (and that one only) > early > to my tree, to make sure it is regression-free.
Does "early" mean that you want to wait and see how the discussion about the other patches evolves before you consider applying them, or does "and that one only" mean that you tend to not apply the other patches at all?
Steffen