From: Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:04:23 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] Glean libexec path from argv[0] for git-upload-pack and git-receive-pack.
Message-ID: <E976B246-AD14-4B03-B204-F6A1014071DF@zib.de>
In-Reply-To: <7viqomx5iq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>


On Jan 10, 2009, at 9:36 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de> writes:
>
>> On Jan 10, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>>
>>> Logically, and to avoid committing a broken revision, 1/6 should  
>>> come
>>> last, methinks.
>>
>> RUNTIME_PREFIX is not defined before 6/6. But I agree,
>> 1/6 should probably be moved after 5/6.
>>
> Hmm, I actually was thinking about applying that (and that one only)  
> early
> to my tree, to make sure it is regression-free.

Does "early" mean that you want to wait and see how the discussion
about the other patches evolves before you consider applying them,
or does "and that one only" mean that you tend to not apply the
other patches at all?

	Steffen