Re: [RFC PATCH v2 12/13] walken: count omitted objects
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- Jun 27, 2019, 05:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cTQ3HG6tvWD=7ZqXF-HKTfqUjqmOW95d-LOaGv3T9HpbQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20190626235032.177551-13-emilyshaffer@google.com>
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 7:51 PM Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com> wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> It may be illuminating to see which objects were not included within a > given filter. This also demonstrates, since filter-spec "tree:1" is > used, that the 'omitted' list contains all objects which are omitted, > not just the first objects which were omitted - that is, it continues to > dereference omitted trees and commits. > [...] > Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com> > --- > diff --git a/builtin/walken.c b/builtin/walken.c > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static void init_walken_defaults(void) > static void final_rev_info_setup(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, > - struct rev_info *rev) > + struct rev_info *rev)
Use the correct indentation in the patch which introduces this code rather than adjusting it in this patch.