Show 25 quoted lines
> On 12/29/2021 4:39 AM, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > No, it's not even rare, let alone very rare. I'd actually call it
> > common. Since 'sparse-checkout disable' does not delete the
> > sparse-checkout file, and we've encouraged folks to use the
> > sparse-checkout command (or a wrapper thereof) instead of direct
> > editing of the sparse-checkout file (and indeed, the sparse-checkout
> > command will overwrite the sparse-checkout file which further
> > discourages users from feeling they own it), having the file left
> > around after disabling is the common case. So, the only question is,
> > how often do users disable and re-enable sparse-checkout, and
> > potentially only do so in some of their worktrees? At my $DAYJOB,
> > that's actually quite common. I got multiple reports quite soon after
> > introducing our `sparsify` tool about users doing something like this;
> > this is what led me to learn of the extensions.worktreeConfig, and why
> > I pointed it out to you on your first submission of
> > git-sparse-checkout[1]
> > (https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BFcH5hQqujjmc88L3qGx3QAYZ_chH6PXQXyp13ipfV6hQ@mail.gmail.com/)
>
> Thank you for these comments and the detailed descriptions of things
> from your $DAYJOB. That's helpful context and I'm happy to switch back
> to enabling the extension in the sparse-checkout builtin. I might need
> to rearrange the code so there is an API in worktree.c instead of just
> the subcommand in builtin/worktree.c, but that's pretty minor. I'll
> keep Eric's earlier suggestion to have the upgrade be a separate call
> from the repo_config_set_worktree_gently().