Re: [PATCH 04/67] fsck: don't fsck alternates for connectivity-only check
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
>> Speaking of which, how do you want the next round of patches? I'm
>> hesitant to spam the list with 67 patches again, when only a fraction
>> have changed (and for all but the _to/_r thing, I've posted my changes
>> already).
>
> Cannot tell yet, as I am only halfway thru myself.
I'm also only about halfway through, plus trying dealing with other topics...
Show 7 quoted lines
> If there is a
> significant update based on discussions, it may be worth sending
> only those so that you can sooner make sure that the resulting
> change and those who reviewed the first iteration are all on the
> same page, but a full resend, before giving enouth time to those who
> are willing to but have not found time to review the whole thing,
> would be a wasted mental bandwidth for everybody, I suspect.
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>