Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 3/8] rebase: cherry-pick: fix sequence continuation
- From
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 29, 2013, 06:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CANiSa6i5hzkNXJMDOPa6gHEkQKjgva4vprbD6UvqGtNFM4Qi-A@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s0MQ-u=Yo1RAoxsVyiAe7xcorCW992xsa4YsEyH9RbzoQ@mail.gmail.com>
:-)
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk > <martinvonz@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Felipe Contreras >> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> One change splits, the other change fixes, what's wrong with that? >> >> I didn't say there was anything wrong. I was asking if the bug was >> there before (and I didn't see an answer when Junio asked). > > Why wouldn't it be before? Did I mention a commit that introduced a > problem? No. Did any patch in this series introduce a problem? No. > > All we've done in this series is 1) reorganize the code without > introducing *ANY* functional changes, and 2) fix a bug. > > If you see 1) introducing a problem, or 2) introducing a problem, then > mention that in *those* patches. If there is no problem with 1) or 2) > then it follows the problem already exists. > > -- > Felipe Contreras