From: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 06:06:47 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 3/8] rebase: cherry-pick: fix sequence continuation
Message-ID: <CANiSa6i5hzkNXJMDOPa6gHEkQKjgva4vprbD6UvqGtNFM4Qi-A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s0MQ-u=Yo1RAoxsVyiAe7xcorCW992xsa4YsEyH9RbzoQ@mail.gmail.com>

:-)

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk
> <martinvonz@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Felipe Contreras
>> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> One change splits, the other change fixes, what's wrong with that?
>>
>> I didn't say there was anything wrong. I was asking if the bug was
>> there before (and I didn't see an answer when Junio asked).
>
> Why wouldn't it be before? Did I mention a commit that introduced a
> problem? No. Did any patch in this series introduce a problem? No.
>
> All we've done in this series is 1) reorganize the code without
> introducing *ANY* functional changes, and 2) fix a bug.
>
> If you see 1) introducing a problem, or 2) introducing a problem, then
> mention that in *those* patches. If there is no problem with 1) or 2)
> then it follows the problem already exists.
>
> --
> Felipe Contreras