Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 3/8] rebase: cherry-pick: fix sequence continuation
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 29, 2013, 05:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s0Zy4KpPN1n6HOVXWyCuevenbSFnH589YngMB9NVWcamQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CANiSa6ivOnRfOVMTsgDygi=2dvxmMOqqWdqs7CBYohThOVzt7Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com> wrote:
> As Junio asked in the previous iteration, shouldn't this have been in > the first patch?
No, the first patch is splitting the code without introducing any functional changes.
This is fixing a bug that already exists, we could fix it before the split, or after, but mixing the split and the fix at the same time is a no-no.
One change splits, the other change fixes, what's wrong with that?
This way it's easy to see what each patch does.
-- Felipe Contreras