Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 3/8] rebase: cherry-pick: fix sequence continuation
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 29, 2013, 06:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s0MQ-u=Yo1RAoxsVyiAe7xcorCW992xsa4YsEyH9RbzoQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CANiSa6h7fY=GNM0VvFXvE-LD=nVWbEBGqWbaheZ6gr518_aPNA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Felipe Contreras > <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>> One change splits, the other change fixes, what's wrong with that? > > I didn't say there was anything wrong. I was asking if the bug was > there before (and I didn't see an answer when Junio asked).
Why wouldn't it be before? Did I mention a commit that introduced a problem? No. Did any patch in this series introduce a problem? No.
All we've done in this series is 1) reorganize the code without introducing *ANY* functional changes, and 2) fix a bug.
If you see 1) introducing a problem, or 2) introducing a problem, then mention that in *those* patches. If there is no problem with 1) or 2) then it follows the problem already exists.
-- Felipe Contreras