From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 06:05:42 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 3/8] rebase: cherry-pick: fix sequence continuation
Message-ID: <CAMP44s0MQ-u=Yo1RAoxsVyiAe7xcorCW992xsa4YsEyH9RbzoQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANiSa6h7fY=GNM0VvFXvE-LD=nVWbEBGqWbaheZ6gr518_aPNA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk
<martinvonz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:

>> One change splits, the other change fixes, what's wrong with that?
>
> I didn't say there was anything wrong. I was asking if the bug was
> there before (and I didn't see an answer when Junio asked).

Why wouldn't it be before? Did I mention a commit that introduced a
problem? No. Did any patch in this series introduce a problem? No.

All we've done in this series is 1) reorganize the code without
introducing *ANY* functional changes, and 2) fix a bug.

If you see 1) introducing a problem, or 2) introducing a problem, then
mention that in *those* patches. If there is no problem with 1) or 2)
then it follows the problem already exists.

-- 
Felipe Contreras