Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Support triangular workflows
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 31, 2013, 20:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0=+7ctiiYJSs3SQvV8aywT4tvwGLZ02KLozP8zjU-LQ2g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vhajvv51f.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: >> [...] > Thanks. That is one of the reasons why we do not want to see too > many custom test helper functions.
I noticed that you queued my original series without modification in rr/triangle. Should I submit a re-roll with Peff's suggestion incorporated?