From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 20:54:16 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Support triangular workflows
Message-ID: <CALkWK0=+7ctiiYJSs3SQvV8aywT4tvwGLZ02KLozP8zjU-LQ2g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vhajvv51f.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>> [...]
> Thanks.  That is one of the reasons why we do not want to see too
> many custom test helper functions.

I noticed that you queued my original series without modification in
rr/triangle.  Should I submit a re-roll with Peff's suggestion
incorporated?