Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Support triangular workflows

> Sometimes it's annoyingly verbose to break down a compound function. But
> I think in this case, you can make your tests more robust by just
> checking the affirmative that the ref is still where we expect it to be,
> like:
>
>   check_push_result up_repo $the_first_commit heads/master
>
> Sorry if that was a bit long-winded. I think that practically speaking,
> it is not a likely source of problems in this case. But it's an
> anti-pattern in our tests that I think is worth mentioning.