Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Support triangular workflows
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 1, 2013, 01:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vli93nhnw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130331214318.GA24646@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 02:21:22AM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > >> Jeff King wrote: >> > [...] >> >> So, you're saying: don't test compound statements for failure, since >> anything in the chain could fail and propagate failure. I should only >> test simple git-foo commands for failure? > > Right.
I think another thing to keep in mind is that "test_must_fail" is used only to check for an expected failure from git-foo commands, not for a random command (or sequence of commands).
The primary point of test_must_fail is not to declare _any_ failure as "Oh, good, I wanted see it to fail and it returned non-zero exit status so I am happy", but exclude uncontrolled failures, by saying "Yuck, it returned non-zero exit status, but it died by signal (e.g. SEGV), which is not the way I wanted to see it die".