Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Support triangular workflows
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 31, 2013, 20:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0=a0wmUe-rjK8Gg8izc0FdXYzChSrgp+W-JNsECsDf+yA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130328153547.GA3337@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
> [...]
So, you're saying: don't test compound statements for failure, since anything in the chain could fail and propagate failure. I should only test simple git-foo commands for failure?
Show 6 quoted lines
> Sometimes it's annoyingly verbose to break down a compound function. But > I think in this case, you can make your tests more robust by just > checking the affirmative that the ref is still where we expect it to be, > like: > > check_push_result up_repo $the_first_commit heads/master
Doesn't that change the meaning of the test though? I really like how the original tests read.