Re: [PATCH v2 04/20] t5800: document some non-functional parts of remote helpers
- From
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 4, 2011, 11:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGdFq_iaGRnfkf=2vxDe--E3oP1CFCvDarkhKJxdgNzGq+KqcA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110619220246.GE23893@elie>
Heya,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 00:02, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks good. What happened to the extra tests (e.g., push tag) > mentioned in the last round?
Do you think they should be added as test_expect_fail targets? I didn't add them because they didn't work, but I suppose it might make sense to at least document these missing features.
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier