From: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 11:19:00 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/20] t5800: document some non-functional parts of remote helpers
Message-ID: <CAGdFq_iaGRnfkf=2vxDe--E3oP1CFCvDarkhKJxdgNzGq+KqcA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110619220246.GE23893@elie>

Heya,

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 00:02, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks good.  What happened to the extra tests (e.g., push tag)
> mentioned in the last round?

Do you think they should be added as test_expect_fail targets? I
didn't add them because they didn't work, but I suppose it might make
sense to at least document these missing features.

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier