Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] decoupling a submodule's existence and its url
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- Mar 13, 2017, 22:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kZ8mRT8HfxNjJ+CG0Abyubs=uF=R4NWuK9Cyhx0_H3niA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170313214341.172676-1-bmwill@google.com>
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> changes in v3: > > * Droped a patch which tried to use a more accurate URL for deinit. It didn't > really fit inside the scope of this series. It may be something we want to > revisit later though. > > * The --init-active flag now ensure that all submodules which are configured to > be 'active' (either via 'submodule.active' or 'submodule.<name>.active') go > through the initialization phase and have their relevent info copied over to > the config. >
This round looks sensible to me.
Thanks, Stefan