Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] decoupling a submodule's existence and its url

> Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> writes:
> 
> > changes in v3:
> >
> > * Droped a patch which tried to use a more accurate URL for deinit.  It didn't
> >   really fit inside the scope of this series.  It may be something we want to
> >   revisit later though.
> >
> > * The --init-active flag now ensure that all submodules which are configured to
> >   be 'active' (either via 'submodule.active' or 'submodule.<name>.active') go
> >   through the initialization phase and have their relevent info copied over to
> >   the config.
> 
> Aside from comments I sent already to the individual patches, I
> think overall this coherently adds a nicer way to keep track of
> which submodules are of interest (and which are not) than what we
> traditionally had.  I'll queue it on 'pu', awaiting further
> polishing (if necessary).