Re: [PATCH 15/18] t7900: mark pack-refs tests as REFFILES
- From
Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
- Date
- Apr 27, 2021, 09:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAFQ2z_O=aHW=fwwdCmyN-bMeuwBeLM_pLBNr7xhjP+M7e=k70g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <87k0ow3yvq.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 9:00 AM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Re [1] maybe this is ok/fine for now, but I think we should really split > out the "is specific to file" part more narrowly (not just here, but in > general). > > E.g. I assume that "pack-refs" is simply redundant under reftable, no?
I've expanded on the commit message to clarify this.
> Should the current behavior documented in > Documentation/git-maintenance.txt change with your series under reftable > etc?
No, not for now. Once the reftable support is landed, we could update the docs to not talk about loose vs packed refs, but that seems premature at the moment.
-- Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays. -- Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado