Re: [PATCH v1 04/25] contrib: remove 'buildsystems'

> Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Felipe Contreras
>> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
>> >> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Felipe Contreras
>> >> > You think changing the execution bit of a file is considered "activity"?
>> >>
>> >> Well, now we're getting into semantics, which I don't care so much
>> >> about.
>> >
>> > Convenient.
>>
>> Yeah, the part above here goes in my "don't argue with idiots, they'll
>> drag you down to their level and beat you with experience"-filter.
>> Good luck trying to convince *anyone* with this line of argumentation.
>
> It has been demonstrated that there is inactivity. The fact that your
> semantics about "inactivity" differ from the rest of the world is
> irrelevant.
>
>> > The script doesn't depend on the version of the Makefile, and proof of
>> > that is that is has *never* been changed even though the Makefile has.
>>
>> Except it has, in 74cf9bd.
>
> Once change in *four* years. My god! How are people ever going to keep
> up with such amount of changes if it moves out-of-tree!
>