Re: Using Transifex in git.git
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 14, 2011, 10:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <BANLkTinkc6yZ39JVtBaENikFj5xPKnh9mw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4DF726F4.3000204@op5.se>
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Ericsson writes:
> It's always better to start coding on changes and then show how those > changes make life easier for people than to suggest something out of > thin air and start a discussion about it before applying any work.
Yes, this would normally be the case. My apologies for being unclear about the purpose of the original email: It's not a sales pitch where I'm trying to sell one translation system - I'm merely trying to find out what features the community at large would like from an abstract web-based translation engine; what should it look like so that it fits into our current patch/ review system? What this translates to in terms of work: evaluation various translation systems, and writing the necessary features into the one that comes closest to what we want. At a glance, Transifex seems to be a good option, but I could easily be wrong about that.
-- Ram