Re: Using Transifex in git.git
- From
Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 15, 2011, 13:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <BANLkTin9bhtB_OPMWCVsbtKBpRXp2o=uLA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <BANLkTikQJYYd4sTJoDrL28Bo35+GpV3HgA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it's a good idea to use a system like Transifex to manage > translations for git.git, so that we can attract a large number of > non-technical translators.
Are we sure we want non-technical translators to translate Git, a highly technical program with many technical terms?
I'm guessing that Git probably should be translated by it's users, because we have a lot of Git-jargon that is difficult for people who doesn't know Git to translate. But perhaps an initial translation for each language is enough to establish a language-specific translation of all Git-jargon, and then afterwards we can get help from non-technical people to improve the language? I'm just asking, I don't know how Transifex works at all...