From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:12:12 GMT
Subject: Re: Using Transifex in git.git
Message-ID: <BANLkTinkc6yZ39JVtBaENikFj5xPKnh9mw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DF726F4.3000204@op5.se>

Hi Andreas,

Andreas Ericsson writes:
> It's always better to start coding on changes and then show how those
> changes make life easier for people than to suggest something out of
> thin air and start a discussion about it before applying any work.

Yes, this would normally be the case.  My apologies for being unclear
about the purpose of the original email: It's not a sales pitch where
I'm trying to sell one translation system - I'm merely trying to find
out what features the community at large would like from an abstract
web-based translation engine; what should it look like so that it fits
into our current patch/ review system?  What this translates to in
terms of work: evaluation various translation systems, and writing the
necessary features into the one that comes closest to what we want.
At a glance, Transifex seems to be a good option, but I could easily
be wrong about that.

-- Ram