Re: Using Transifex in git.git
- From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 15, 2011, 20:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <BANLkTik7Kb6ae0aRNjL3RcMouhw2gkOwPA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <BANLkTin9bhtB_OPMWCVsbtKBpRXp2o=uLA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 15:21, Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra > <artagnon@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think it's a good idea to use a system like Transifex to manage >> translations for git.git, so that we can attract a large number of >> non-technical translators. > > Are we sure we want non-technical translators to translate Git, a > highly technical program with many technical terms?
Well, usually even bad translations (although not horribly bad) are better than nothing.
Most translated strings will have little or nothing git-specific about them, but will be something like "We couldn't open file %s due to XYZ".
And even if someone translates e.g. "branch" incorrectly they usually do so consistently, so it's easy to search & replace those sort of issues out of existence.