git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Using Transifex in git.git

From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date
Jun 15, 2011, 10:10 UTC
Message-ID
<BANLkTin5mJ4WsAd6eRUUoJykxRu+vJ-_oQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<4DF86BB3.4070906@op5.se>
Hi again,
Andreas Ericsson writes:
Show 14 quoted lines
> No and no. No auto-signoff, and no auto-message. That will just leave
> us with a long string of auto-signoffs and automatic messages, and
> that's horrible.
>
> The "no auto-signoff" rule is from Junio btw, and I doubt he's changed
> his mind regarding that. The "no auto-message" is just my gut feeling
> that everyone will really hate to see changes without an explanation.
> Something simple like "5 out of 6 of the large scm's (in terms of
> userbase) uses 'blarg' instead of 'fnurg' for commits, so let's call
> it that in our examplinitian translation too" is enough and will be
> quite helpful when it comes to explaining why a change is made.
>
> Otoh, "Updated translations for new release" will probably be the
> most common message, and that's fine too if that's what happened.
1. Auto signoffs: Do you want translators to explicitly type out s-o-b
message after contributing a few translations?! I think it's fair to
assume that many of us use auto-signoffs as well -- I personally have
format.signoff set to true, but I've read SubmittingPatches.  I don't
propose to have a blind auto signoff, but translators can atleast be
forced to read the agreement and hit "Yes, I want to auto signoff all
my contributions".
2. Auto commit messages: Er, what I meant: the translation coordinator
has to clean up the history and fill in the commit messages before she
tries to get the new translations merged into git.git. The lazy
translators have the option of leaving it empty.

One quick query: Let's say there are 10 tiny commits modifying the same line in the same language, and the translation coordinator wants to squash these into one. Is it alright to have the authorship info point to the coordinator, with the commit message crediting all 10 individual translators?

-- Ram
Previous: Andreas EricssonNext: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Message 9 of 14 in “Using Transifex in git.git”
  1. Ramkumar RamachandraJun 14, 2011
  2. Andreas EricssonJun 14, 2011
  3. Ramkumar RamachandraJun 14, 2011
  4. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonJun 14, 2011
  5. Ramkumar RamachandraJun 14, 2011
  6. Andreas EricssonJun 14, 2011
  7. Ramkumar RamachandraJun 15, 2011
  8. Andreas EricssonJun 15, 2011
  9. Ramkumar RamachandraJun 15, 2011
  10. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonJun 15, 2011
  11. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonJun 15, 2011
  12. Erik Faye-LundJun 15, 2011
  13. Michael WittenJun 15, 2011
  14. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonJun 15, 2011

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.