Re: Rebase/cherry-picking idea

From: Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr>
Date: Nov 26, 2007, 12:39 UTC
Message-ID: <B14406EA-E1E8-4737-8FCE-853A3BBBE34C@lrde.epita.fr>
In-Reply-To: <CDF48716-F198-4B33-A5F5-8A2DE1F177EB@wincent.com>

On Nov 26, 2007, at 1:34 PM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:

Show 8 quoted lines

> How about something like this? It would obviously be nice if we  
> could avoid adding another option to builtin-revert; perhaps when/ 
> if git-rebase becomes a builtin we can avoid that. The other  
> alternative, and probably one I like I bit more, would be to auto- 
> detect that a rebase is in progress by looking inside the GIT_DIR,  
> although that would also alter the behaviour of manual invocations  
> of git-revert and git-cherry-pick during an interactive rebase (do  
> people actually do that?). What do you think?

Hmm yeah, I agree that it's a little bit of a dirty workaround but, as you pointed out, until rebase is builtinified, this looks like the best/easiest alternative.

-- 
Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna
EPITA Research and Development Laboratory