Re: Consistent terminology: cached/staged/index
- From
Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
- Date
- Feb 14, 2011, 22:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTinnCLVDEZpNPVYZ2fq1BY=257BTxkzNj44-Yz3O@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vtyg6tu9e.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> writes: >> Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes: >>> Short options should really not be "wasted" easily. "-s" named after "to >>> stage" is really problematic, as outlined in this thread. >> >> Er, but the point is that this is _such_ a common operation, that a >> short option for it would not be "wasted" at all. > > True, but I am afraid "-c" is not it, as it would certainly be confusing > to users who know what "diff" does before they learn "git diff".
Er...?
Here we were talking about using "-s" (inspired by "--staged"), which I suggested because you earlier objected to "-c"...
-miles
-- Cat is power. Cat is peace.