Re: Consistent terminology: cached/staged/index
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 14, 2011, 14:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTi=N7N31D09YoRQsGTntspUfZRjfNHQtVpUfRus_@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTikWsNgL6dSHueGCXw0jH4hnvai81X=EQERuw3Qi@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Michael J Gruber > <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote: >> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy venit, vidit, dixit 14.02.2011 14:14: >>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Michael J Gruber >>> <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote: >>>> Full disclaimer: I have an alias "staged" for "diff --cached" myself... >>> >>> Be careful with your fingers. There's a command named "git stage". >> >> I know. Can we remove it as part of 1.8.0? It's our only builtin alias. > > I have proposed before to extend 'git stage', so you can do 'git stage > diff', or if you alias 'git stage' to 'git s', just 'git s diff'. This > would not conflict with the old behavior of 'git stage $file'.
It does. What if I want to stage a file named "add", "rm" or "diff"?
-- Duy