Re: Consistent terminology: cached/staged/index
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 14, 2011, 22:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vzkpyql2r.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTinnCLVDEZpNPVYZ2fq1BY=257BTxkzNj44-Yz3O@mail.gmail.com>
Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> writes:
> Er...? > > Here we were talking about using "-s" (inspired by "--staged"), which > I suggested because you earlier objected to "-c"...
Not _we were_, but _you_ were.
I actually was hoping that it was obvious that -s is a no-starter from the messages so far in this thread, as neither --cached nor its more descriptive spelling --index-only has character 's' anywhere in it, and we have been keeping --staged as a low-key synonym for a reason.