Re: Consistent terminology: cached/staged/index
- From
Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
- Date
- Feb 27, 2011, 00:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87wrkmfirm.fsf@catnip.gol.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110226215139.GA19176@elie>
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
> This is how "staging area" has been gaining popularity, I think --- > some (out-of-tree) documentation that is good for other reasons uses > it, and it really does seem to be a clearer term than "index" for > "place where the next commit is being prepared".
Also "magit" uses the label "Staging area:" for the list of files to be committed -- and the key-binding to add a file to that list is "s"...
-Miles
-- Christian, n. One who follows the teachings of Christ so long as they are not inconsistent with a life of sin.