Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization

From: Robert Buck <buck.robert.j@gmail.com>
Date: May 9, 2010, 10:35 UTC
Message-ID: <AANLkTimDIPJpwpAJPTBIYK6QLwfBBpYP0w2RTvKbRys5@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <42C31791-ACD3-4D43-99E6-287F9E63EDAB@gmail.com>

On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Eyvind Bernhardsen <eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 15 quoted lines

> On 9. mai 2010, at 01.42, Dmitry Potapov wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 02:54:35PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> You could talk about "binary" vs "text", and it would make sense, but your
>>> argument that "eol" is somehow better than "crlf" is just insane.
>>>
>>> So I could certainly see
>>>
>>>      *.jpg binary
>>>      *.txt text
>>>
>>> making sense. But "eol" is certainly no better than "crlf".

Linus - Perhaps I missed this, but where would you this typemap exist? I like this sort of prescriptive approach; out of the box users would get a bunch of reasonable defaults, but they could customize it by adding/changing them.