Re: gitk : french translation

From: Emmanuel Trillaud <etrillaud@gmail.com>
Date: Nov 11, 2009, 01:10 UTC
Message-ID: <9f50533b0911101710q2f1ed9a4i7b682988a0983ef8@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091110204742.GA27518@vidovic>

2009/11/10 Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>:

>> commiter : auteur du commit : commiteur
>
> Why not "commiteur" for gitk too?

It's ok for me.

Show 9 quoted lines

>> Check out : Récupérer : charger
>> to cherry-pick : Ceuillir
>> Diff : Différence : Diff
>
> See comment at the end.
>
>> Soft (Reset) : Douce :
>
> Léger ?

Souds better. I will make the change, except if someone has a better proposal.

Show 8 quoted lines

>> I prefer to translate "Diff" by "Différences" _especially_ when we are
>> talking about the action of making a "diff"
>
> You don't explain _why_. We had 3 points in favour of the "diff" term in
> french in this thread (keep Git's commands consistency, rough
> translation and english word more used even by french people as for
> "patch"). I have another argument to use "diff" now: keep consistency
> with 'git gui'.

I see now that I have no good reasons to prefer "Différences".

>> translation of "cherry-pick". For this one we could use "<translation>
>> (<english-word>) ..." as suggest previously.
>
> I'm fine here.

Thanks for your comments.

Emmanuel Trillaud