Re: gitk : french translation
- From
- Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>
- Date
- Nov 7, 2009, 02:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20091107025439.GC13724@vidovic>
- In-Reply-To
- <9f50533b0911061259w54b57fcdo2c0b21e95dbbdc54@mail.gmail.com>
[ Please, conform to Documentation/SubmittingPatches of the git.git project and send your patches inline to make the work for reviewers easier.
Both of your patches lack the Signed-off-by but maybe you don't want them to be merged? ]
The 06/11/09, Emmanuel Trillaud wrote:
> > Here is an updated translation with the following changes:
<...>
> > - make some consistency changes > > * s/diff/différences/ > > * s/patch/correctif/ everywhere
I disagree here. Words like "diff", "commit", "patch", etc should be kept as is. Translation of those terms make things harder for the users.
> > IMHO the most important should be to decide how to translate the git vocabulary. > > The Subversion project has guidelines concerning that issue: > > http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/trunk/subversion/po/fr.po?revision=39920&view=markup > > It may be a good idea to stick with what they are doing if possible.
No, no. SVN and Git vocabulary/operations are not identical (not only for 'commit' as you stated). Please, don't make things harder than it already is.
-- Nicolas Sebrecht