From: Robert Anderson <rwa000@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 16:00:11 GMT
Subject: Re: An alternate model for preparing partial commits
Message-ID: <9af502e50806280900m415eb354waee9edac91a70e8d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9b3e2dc20806280734i6ca17cc8i447c2e2db67e8051@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Stephen Sinclair <radarsat1@gmail.com> wrote:
> The answer is simple: you should not be making partial commits to a
> repo that has been cloned.  You should instead be working somewhere
> else and then pushing to it.  So this whole sentence is just a moot
> point itself.

Ah, now you've hit the crux.  Thank you for the "svn style" response
here.  I "should not" because git has a deficiency.  Absolutely no
other reason.

Thanks,
Bob