From: Robert Anderson <rwa000@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:07:38 GMT
Subject: Re: An alternate model for preparing partial commits
Message-ID: <9af502e50806271107m18dfb300mfed0e2aa401cc8d9@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0806271854120.9925@racer>

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Robert Anderson wrote:
>
>> Here's a patch to match the local culture:  "It is incredible how stupid
>> the idea of the index is."
>>
>> Clearly you should now be interested.
>
> No, you're wrong.  I am totall uninterested in talking to you now.
>

Tongue in cheek, of course - a play on Linus' "narrow minded views"
about svn.  Not much of a sense of humor, eh?

You may consider the idea that the next committed state ought to be
available for build/test to be a "narrow-minded" view.  I find it to
be a manifestly sound view.  In fact, if you disagree I have little
respect for your technical judgment and therefore am not concerned if
you will not talk with me.  Which is too bad on both counts.

Thanks,
Bob