Re: What is missing from Git v2.0
- From
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
- Date
- Apr 24, 2014, 09:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <8738h3ayom.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <5358ca1a55a69_1f7b143d3101c@nysa.notmuch>
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
Show 22 quoted lines
> David Kastrup wrote: >> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > James Denholm wrote: >> >> Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >> >This is a false dichotomy; there aren't just two kinds >> >> > of Git users. >> >> > >> >> > There is such a category of Git users who are not >> >> > fresh-out-of-the-boat, yet not power users either. >> >> >> >> Oh, I didn't mean to suggest a dichotomy of any kind. However these are the >> >> two groups (I suggest) are the most immediately relevant - one calls for >> >> change, and the other would be negatively impacted. >> > >> > Nobody would be negatively impacted. Who would be impacted negatively >> > by having default aliases? >> >> The people having to read and understand scripts written in the >> expectation of default aliases. > > Which are imaginary.
And I prefer them to stay that way since then one does not need to worry about them.
Show 7 quoted lines
>> > And I have showed they are not problems. >> >> You managed to convince yourself, so feel free to put aliases in >> every Git you use and distribute. > > There is evidence for the claim that there won't be those > problems. You have absolutely no evidence there there will.
As I said: you managed to convince yourself and may milk that for all that it's worth.
-- David Kastrup